Authority is a boundary, not a suggestion.
A design note on keeping evidence, proposals, permissions, and consequential actions distinguishable.
Research matters when it helps us ask better questions about the systems we build—and test the answers against evidence.
We explore agents, reasoning, memory, planning, tool use, evaluation, safety, and verification. Our public notes explain methods and design questions. They do not claim benchmark superiority, a released foundation model, peer review, or independent assessment.
A design note on keeping evidence, proposals, permissions, and consequential actions distinguishable.
A technical note on the bounded arithmetic workflow implemented in this website preview.
Useful evaluation asks whether the system helped achieve a real outcome under stated conditions.
We consider how more capable assistance can remain bounded and accountable.
The Merism website preview makes one small verification boundary inspectable. Its arithmetic can be checked locally; it does not establish a deployed model capability or general agent reliability.
Inspect the synthetic example ↗